Groups file lawsuit over Arizona abortion limits

2013-05-29T10:00:00Z 2013-05-29T17:50:54Z Groups file lawsuit over Arizona abortion limitsBy Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services Arizona Daily Star

PHOENIX — Calling the measure racist, a coalition of rights groups filed suit Wednesday to overturn a two-year-old law banning abortion for race or gender selection.

The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of the NAACP as well as the National Asian Pacific Women's Forum, asks U.S. District Court Judge Paul Rosenblatt to declare the law is an unconstitutional infringement on the right of minority women to terminate their pregnancy without being questioned about the reason why. It also seeks an order to bar both the Attorney General's Office and the Arizona Medical Board from enforcing any part of the law.

Challengers said that the 2011 law — which they say is unique in the entire country — was approved based on claims by Rep. Steve Montenegro, R-Litchfield Park, that the rates of abortions for black women were higher than for other groups.

Montenegro also cited evidence, much of it from Asian countries, that women there were far more likely to abort a female child than a male. That got extrapolated to questions about the practices of Asian women in Arizona even though there was no evidence presented linking abortions here to gender selection.

Monica Ennis, past president of the Arizona Black Nurses Association and member of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, called it “an insult to the intelligence of African-American and Asian women.”

More to the point that challengers will have to prove in court, the lawsuit charges violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

“Its purpose is to reduce the rate or number of black and API (Asian and Pacific Islander) women who have abortions, but not women of any other race,” the lawsuit says. It also charges that the law is "based on racist and discriminatory stereotypes” about both groups.

Montenegro argued that lawmakers are entitled to protect unborn children from being aborted solely because of their race or gender. And he said that the civil rights of these fetuses trumps the rights of women to terminate their pregnancies.

He acknowledged, though, that the rulings so far from the U.S. Supreme Court since the landmark 1973 ruling of Roe v. Wade have said women have an absolute right to have an abortion, at least prior to viability, without regard to a reason why. Montenegro said, though, he disagrees with that ruling.

The 2011 law makes it a felony, punishable by up to 7 years in prison, for a doctor to perform an abortion “knowing that the abortion is sought based on the sex or race of the child or the race of the parent of that child.”

To enforce the law, it requires the woman to sign an affidavit saying she is not terminating the pregnancy because of the child's sex or race. That affidavit becomes part of her medical record which can be accessed by the Arizona Medical Board and, ultimately, by prosecutors.

There is no record of anyone having been prosecuted since the measure was signed into law by Gov. Jan Brewer.

In pushing the legislation in 2011, Montenegro said there was evidence that blacks have a higher abortion rate than other races. And he said those who perform such procedures are “the people behind genocides.”

But the legal papers filed by Dan Pochoda of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona said there was never any evidence during hearings or floor debate of any woman in Arizona who had an abortion with the intent to reduce the number of blacks in Arizona or in the overall national population.

Similarly, challengers said that whatever the evidence from Asian countries about gender-based abortion, there was no evidence that is happening here. Anyway, they argued, most abortions in Arizona are performed before the time when the sex of the fetus can be determined.

Miriam Yeung, executive director of the National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum said the legislation is based on “offensive generalizations about our community.”

“As a result, it turns Asian-American women in Arizona into suspects,” she said.

And ACLU staff attorney Alexa Kolbi-Molinas said black and Asian-American women have the right to make these decisions "without being cast as villains or as women who the state must monitor because they cannot be trusted to make this decision on their own.''

Montenegro called it “unfortunate” that others would see his legislation as racist.

“We have never inferred that,” he said. "What we're trying to do is to make sure that those kinds of things, that discrimination like that, isn't happening by allowing an abortion or at least standing by here in Arizona and even letting it get to the point where we allow an abortion to happen based on the baby's race or sex.”

Read more in tomorrow's Star

Copyright 2014 Arizona Daily Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Activate

Latest Election 2014 video

More

Meet the Candidate: Doug Ducey for Governor

Doug Ducey explains his plan for economic growth.

Follow the Arizona Daily Star

Get weekly ads via e-mail