Fight over baby formula lacks common sense

2010-07-16T00:00:00Z Fight over baby formula lacks common senseOpinion by Ruth Marcus Washington Post Writers Group Arizona Daily Star

Sometimes an obscure lobbying fight tells a larger story. This phenomenon is playing out right now on the unlikely issue of infant formula - and the broader, disturbing lesson is how hard it is to take even the most common-sense steps to save taxpayer dollars.

Infant formula is big business, and formula makers' biggest customer by far is the federal government. More than half of U.S. formula sales come through the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), which provides it free. In fiscal 2009, formula accounted for $850 million of WIC's $7.3 billion budget.

Starting in 2002, formula makers began to offer products with additives - docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) - to replicate fatty acids in breast milk. Not surprisingly, these formulas cost more. The Agriculture Department, which oversees WIC, allowed state programs to decide what formula to buy. Not surprisingly, formula makers lobbied states to spring for the souped-up versions.

And, perhaps not coincidentally, when WIC was reauthorized in 2004, Congress tucked in language telling states that when soliciting bids for infant formula, they could not require manufacturers to include or omit specific ingredients.

You can guess what happened next: Formula makers began submitting bids only for the costlier products. A February 2010 Agriculture Department study pegged the added cost at $91 million annually, more than a tenth of the infant formula budget. Now new formulas with even more ingredients - and even higher prices - are being offered through WIC.

No one expects WIC to go back to the old formula. In fact, it's not even available. The real issue is what happens as these kinds of ingredients proliferate. DHA and ARA are turning up in everything from baby foods to eggs to juice, along with other ingredients such as prebiotics, probiotics, lutein and lycopene. Additives are threatening to become The Thing That Ate the WIC Budget.

With WIC up for reauthorization, the Senate Agriculture Committee has approved a measure to require the USDA to assess the additives. A House panel is poised to consider a similar provision.

Not surprisingly, formula makers - Abbott, Nestle and Mead Johnson - are lobbying hard against the provision. So is the manufacturer of the additives, Martek Biosciences Corp.

The industry trade group, the International Formula Council, was also quick to play the race card, arguing that it "would likely result in a two-tiered system, in which nutritionally at-risk WIC participants, many of whom are minorities, are denied access to products widely available to the general population."

This touching concern for the poor would be more persuasive if those supporting a scientific review did not include the National WIC Association; the California WIC Association, the largest state group; and the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Lawmakers who like to lecture about wasting taxpayer dollars are oddly hostile to a provision that could spend them more wisely. In the House committee, Michigan Republican Peter Hoekstra is expected to try to strike the review provision, and it is at risk of being removed on the Senate floor.

Ruth Marcus' e-mail address is marcusr@washpost.com

Copyright 2014 Arizona Daily Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Activate

Latest Fitz Report video

More

Fitz studio: How to draw the President

In this video tutorial, Star cartoonist and columnist David Fitzsimmons teaches you how to draw the Preside…

Latest Newsmakers video

More

Newsmakers interview: Daniel Hernandez Jr.

Sarah chats with Daniel Hernandez Jr., president of the Sunnyside Unified School District board, about chan…

Featured businesses

View more...

Deals, offers & events

View more...

Event Calendar

Today's events | Add an event

Most viewed: