Disputed chelation therapy slightly reduces risk of serious heart problems, study finds

2013-03-28T00:00:00Z Disputed chelation therapy slightly reduces risk of serious heart problems, study findsAmina Khan Los Angeles Times Arizona Daily Star
March 28, 2013 12:00 am  • 

LOS ANGELES - A treatment that removes heavy metals from the body has long been touted as an alternative therapy to combat hardening arteries. Now a 10-year, $31 million clinical trial has found that chelation therapy does help heart attack patients slightly reduce their risk of serious heart problems - but not enough for the researchers to encourage mainstream cardiologists to offer it to their patients.

The trial revealed a very modest benefit for patients who took chelation therapy rather than a placebo, according to results published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The findings came in for harsh criticism by other experts who worried that the results might encourage patients to take up a still unproven and potentially dangerous treatment.

"It's a type of medical quackery that has been around for many decades," said Dr. Steven Nissen, chair of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.

Chelation therapy was introduced around World War II as an antidote against an arsenic-based poison gas called Lewisite. The drug tested in the JAMA study - called ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid, or EDTA - was used to treat lead poisoning in Navy personnel who repainted ships' hulls.

About 50 years ago, it came into vogue as an apparent way to remove mineral-rich deposits of plaque that can cause arteries to harden in a condition known as atherosclerosis.

Though still on the fringe, chelation therapy has been gaining traction: A National Center for Health Statistics report estimated that 111,000 patients had the expensive, time-consuming therapy in 2007 - a 68 percent jump from 2002. Patients clearly needed more information about this unproven treatment, said Dr. Judith Hochman, a cardiologist at New York University who was not involved in the study.

"There was an imperative to study it," Hochman said.

The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute - two branches of the National Institutes of Health - agreed to fund it. Researchers from 134 facilities agreed to administer a cocktail comprising disodium EDTA, vitamins and electrolytes or a placebo to 1,708 patients who were at least 50 years old and had suffered a heart attack at least six weeks earlier. The 40 infusions were spread out over more than a year.

The researchers found that chelation did reduce patients' overall risk of heart problems, such as stroke and angina requiring hospitalization. Chelation patients' heart attack rate was 6 percent, compared with 8 percent for those on the placebo.

The strongest effect was seen with procedures to reopen the coronary artery: 15 percent of chelation patients needed them, compared with 18 percent of patients who got the placebo treatment. The difference was small, but it was just enough to be statistically significant, said Dr. Gervasio Lamas, the Columbia University cardiologist who led the study.

Lamas said all researchers were thoroughly trained for their duties, whether they were doctors experienced in clinical trials or alternative medicine practitioners with expertise in chelation treatments.

Copyright 2014 Arizona Daily Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Activate

Follow the Arizona Daily Star

Deals, offers & events

View more...