You have permission to edit this article.
Court: Conviction in child prostitution case doesn't require child
web only

Court: Conviction in child prostitution case doesn't require child

  • Updated

PHOENIX — A conviction and sentence for child prostitution doesn’t necessarily require that an actual child be involved, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

The justices rejected the arguments by Francis F. Kraps that he could not be sentenced to both enhanced and consecutive prison terms because the “child” he had arranged to meet at a Prescott-area motel actually turned out to be an undercover police officer.

Justice Ann Scott Timmer, writing for the unanimous court, said Arizona law makes it a crime to engage in prostitution with a minor if the person knows — or believes — the youth was 17 or younger. That, she said, makes it legally irrelevant that Kraps was actually conversing online with someone who was older.

Kraps was one of several people arrested in 2014 in a “sting” operation. Officers posed online as 16-year-old runaways willing to engage in sexual conduct for money. When a person showed up at the hotel room and met the “child” they were arrested. By law, those convicted of such offenses must be sentenced to at least seven years in prison and can be incarcerated for up to 21 years. There also is no possibility of probation.

But in a pretrial ruling, Yavapai County Superior Court Judge Jennifer Campbell concluded the lack of an actual juvenile meant the mandatory sentence does not apply.

On Twitter: @azcapmedia

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News