Hundreds of Arizona families could lose public-housing assistance under a proposed Trump administration rule designed to crack down on undocumented immigrants.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, under President Trump, is floating a new rule that would evict families living in public housing if any member of the household is undocumented.

Undocumented immigrants are not eligible to receive public housing assistance from the federal government, but they can live in public housing if a family member who is a U.S. citizen qualifies for assistance.

The new HUD rule would change that — and at least 380 families in Maricopa County could be evicted as a result.

Legal residents could be evicted

HUD provides housing assistance to low-income households through a variety of programs, such as the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and traditional public housing. Most commonly, families pay about 30 percent of their household income on rent, and HUD makes up the difference.

Only legal residents are eligible for HUD assistance. Currently, “mixed-status” households — families with both legal and undocumented members — can apply for housing assistance, but the amount of funding they receive is prorated to only support the legal residents.

For example, if two children are in the United States legally, but their parents are not, local housing authorities can provide housing assistance to that family, but will reduce the amount of assistance to 50 percent, as to only apply to the children.

If the new HUD rule takes effect, the 25,000 mixed-status families that currently receive housing assistance across the country no longer would qualify.

Unless the undocumented members of the household leave, the entire household — including those who are legal residents — would be evicted.

HUD estimates there are about 108,000 people in the United States living in mixed-status households that receive HUD assistance — 76,000 are legally eligible to receive housing assistance and 55,000 of those are children.

At least 380 such households currently receive housing assistance from the Maricopa County, Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Chandler and Scottsdale housing authorities.

The number does not include all impacted households in Maricopa County, as it does not include households that receive assistance from the Arizona Public Housing Authority, Tempe’s housing authority or directly from HUD.

The lion’s share of mixed-status households — 300 families — reside in Phoenix, according to the city’s housing department.

However, mixed-status families make up only 3% of the total number of households that receive housing assistance through Phoenix’s housing department.

Phoenix Mayor Kate Gallego criticized the proposed rule, saying, “We want to be reducing homelessness, not increasing it.”

”I have grave concerns about the number of children who are U.S. citizens and could lose their housing as a result of this rule. We want all people in our community to have roofs over their heads,” Gallego said in a statement.

ben Carson: “Take care of your own first”

Millions of families are on wait lists for housing assistance across the country.

During testimony before the House Financial Services Committee earlier this month, HUD Secretary Ben Carson said the new rule was necessary to move fully documented families into housing.

”It seems only logical that taxpaying American citizens should be taken care of first. It’s not that we’re cruel, mean-hearted. It’s that we are logical. This is common sense. You take care of your own first,” Carson said.

HUD estimates that the new rule would remove about 25,000 households — or 108,000 people — from its housing-assistance programs.

Housing experts say the new rule is a far cry from solving the nation’s affordable-housing crisis and could end up decreasing the number of families HUD assists.

”It’s not going to make a dent in the problem,” Urban Institute researcher Martha Galvez said.

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

According to HUD’s impact analysis, replacing mixed-status families with fully documented families will cost the department an extra $193 million to $227 million annually, because mixed-status families cost HUD less since their assistance is prorated.

If Congress does not increase HUD’s funding to cover the increased costs, the department may end up providing assistance to fewer families because of the budget shortfall.

Galvez also pointed to the potential cost of administering the new rule, which only applies to a small percentage of the people who receive public-housing assistance.

”How much (administrative) time are people expected to spend on a small number of people?” Galvez said.

“Changing the rules in the middle of the game”

Tim Kaiser, executive director of the Public Housing Authorities Directors Association, said local housing authorities are concerned about the administrative burden of the new rule — but mostly they fear they’ll be forced to evict people whom they have previously assisted.

“The most objectionable thing for our members is this is moving the goalposts for the residents that have been served under an existing policy,” Kaiser said.

Chicanos Por La Causa, a Phoenix-based Hispanic nonprofit that provides housing and other services throughout the Southwest, manages eight properties with HUD funding, according to Nikki Ramirez, director of supporting housing services.

”We would be denying applications in the future that we would have approved in the past,” Ramirez said of the new rule. “The majority of (people in those) households are American citizens, and they have a right to public assistance.”

She said it’s difficult to quantify the true impact of the rule, because it would affect not only mixed-status families that are currently receiving housing assistance but also those on wait lists who are expecting to receive assistance in coming years.

She said if the rule takes effect, it will be difficult to find other housing options for these families, who typically make between 30-50 percent of the average area income — especially in Maricopa County, which is facing significant housing affordability issues.

”Where else do they go? What else can they do?” Ramirez said.

Reach the reporter at or 480-694-1823. Follow her on Twitter @jboehm_NEWS.


Danyelle joined the Star in 2018 and covers K-12 education. Previously, Danyelle wrote for the Tucson Weekly where she won several statewide awards including story of the year and first place investigative reporting.