Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Tim Steller's opinion: You can count on Ducey to do the bare minimum
top story

Tim Steller's opinion: You can count on Ducey to do the bare minimum

Opinion: When crisis strikes and action is unavoidable, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey will do what's absolutely required of him, nothing more

We can count on Gov. Doug Ducey for one thing.

Time and again, he has shown that if he absolutely has to do something, he will do the bare minimum.

When crises are facing the state, it would usually be better if he did more, sooner. But that’s not the Ducey way.

This became clear again Monday, when the two crises of the moment hit key inflection points. Rudy Giuliani brought his “election fraud” circus to Arizona on the same day Arizona officials were required to certify the state’s election results.

And in Tucson, Mayor Regina Romero proposed a new curfew in the city to deal with the COVID-19 outbreak, blaming the governor’s inaction for forcing her hand. It’s a questionable idea but made in a vacuum left by the governor.

Ducey surprised and pleased many Arizona Democrats, moderates and realistic Republicans when he signed the election certification.

He even ignored a call from the White House that came in as he went through the signing ceremony, symbolically silencing “Hail to the Chief,” the ringtone Ducey gave to the White House on his mobile phone.

It pleased people like me that he did it, since Ducey was such a strong Trump supporter in the presidential campaign, and the president was beseeching him not to certify. Trump went on to blast the governor Monday evening, after Ducey certified the election, in a live call to the Giuliani show in Phoenix and via Twitter.

But Ducey’s certification wasn’t an act of great bravery. The governor is required by law to certify on the fourth Monday in November the election canvass that each of Arizona’s 15 counties had already certified. Only the wild flailing of a desperate president made a routine, minimal act seem brave.

In a Twitter thread Monday night, Ducey gave a respectful nod to those perpetuating the election-fraud charade while defending his decision to sign.

“The problems that exist in other states simply don’t apply here,” he wrote.

But of course, none of the legal challenges in other states have produced any evidence that the final tallies were incorrect, either. Lawsuits in Pennsylvania and recounts in Wisconsin and Georgia have led back to the same result: Biden won fair and square. So far, all legal challenges have produced the same outcome in Arizona.

What Ducey hasn’t done — what would take true bravery — is to confront the claims of election fraud head on.

The claims made Monday at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix had the veneer of credibility for those who don’t know how elections work. But they are in essence an effort to steal a fair election by claiming fraud while sitting among friends in a hotel, not among adversaries in a courtroom.

Kathren Coleman, the former deputy recorder of Maricopa County, watched the majority of the 10-hour event Giuliani put on, attended by Southern Arizona legislators Sen. David Gowan and Reps. Mark Finchem, Bret Roberts and David Cook.

The witnesses, Coleman said, “aren’t knowledgeable enough about elections to have any idea how wrong they are.”

“A vast majority of the signature verification theory they talked about lacked facts,” Coleman said. “They said signatures are not reviewed. That is unequivocally not true.”

One self-proclaimed expert argued that votes were “weighted” in favor of Biden at a rate of 1.3 per vote and against Trump at a rate of 0.7% per vote.

“What they were trying to say doesn’t have any basis in reality,” Coleman said.

The voting machines just count. One vote equals one vote — there is no weighting.

Ducey has sat back and watched these allegations play out, much the way he has sat back and watched the latest COVID-19 outbreak play out. Much the way he sat back and watched the teachers’ strike play out in 2018. Much the way he sat back and let KidsCare languish in 2016.

He leads from behind if he leads at all.

You could blame politics for his reticence. But the truth is, either way a politician goes on COVID-19, political danger awaits. Romero is facing a recall for allegedly overreaching in her response to the pandemic; Ducey faces a recall for doing too little.

I know I’d rather face a recall for doing too much than too little.

Romero blamed Ducey Monday for leaving her to take action on behalf of one city that should be coordinated among all jurisdictions statewide. Her preference, Romero said, would be that the governor impose a statewide mask mandate and curfew than for her to go it alone.

“The reality is we have waited and waited and waited for the governor, and despite a huge surge, we have not seen any meaningful action from Gov. Ducey,” she said Monday. “It makes no sense that we are in a worse place than in the summer, but the governor refuses to act.”

Now, in recent weeks, Ducey’s public relations team has stressed that cities such as Tucson, which adopted their own mask ordinances, have not been enforcing them. Patrick Ptak, Daniel Scarpinato and others pointed out this apparent hypocrisy as if it demonstrated the mayors’ complaints were simply political griping by Democrats against a Republican.

No doubt some politics are involved. But practically speaking, a statewide mandate would help emphasize the message that for now masks are essential and mandatory wherever the public gathers, no exceptions.

Now, I’m not convinced that this Tucson curfew, which passed Tuesday evening by a 6-0 vote, will help much, if at all. Of course, the virus is still working from 5 a.m. to 10 p.m. when there is no curfew.

But I sympathize with the positions the city governments are in: A wave of COVID-19 infections is rising, and they want to do something to keep hospitals accessible and prevent deaths before the wave crashes.

Yet, Romero said the governor is incommunicado. Answering a question from KOLD’s Bud Foster on Monday, she said she has not spoken with the governor since March. March! That’s inexcusable.

“We called the governor’s office through the weekend and again today,” Romero said. “We asked for a five- to 10-minute call. Unfortunately the governor declined to speak with me today. He did say he was very busy.”

Yes, he was busy doing the bare minimum in response to another crisis.

To contact opinion columnist Tim Steller: or 807-7789. On Twitter: @senyorreporter.

Concerned about COVID-19?

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News