Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Arizona's top prosecutor sides with bars in legal fight over ordered closures
editor's pick top story

Arizona's top prosecutor sides with bars in legal fight over ordered closures

  • Updated

The Good Oak Bar at 316 E. Congress St. was among those forced to close. Some Arizona bar owners are challenging Gov. Doug Ducey’s shutdown orders.

PHOENIX — Gov. Doug Ducey’s closing of bars in Arizona while allowing restaurants to remain open — and continue to sell alcoholic beverages — is illegal, the state’s top prosecutor said Friday.

In new court filings, Attorney General Mark Brnovich said state lawmakers have given the governor certain powers to act on his own in cases of declared emergency.

But Brnovich said those laws require Ducey to act “consistent with other statutes and the Constitution.” And he said nothing in the statute entitles the governor to issue orders that are “arbitrary, unreasonable and discriminatory,” which is what Brnovich said is happening here.

Brnovich pointed out that Ducey not only is allowing restaurants to remain open but even to sell alcoholic beverages to go, something specifically prohibited by state law. And Brnovich said nothing in the powers that lawmakers gave him to act in cases of emergency allow him to ignore state law.

If Ducey believes there is a reason for closing bars and giving more rights to restaurants there’s a simple solution: Call the Legislature into special session and ask for the power to do that, Brnovich said. But Ducey has not done that even though he issued his first executive order in March.

“It is incumbent on the governor to promptly call the legislature into extraordinary session during this extraordinary time,” wrote Assistant Attorney General Beau Roysden on behalf of Brnovich. “Nearly six months into the declared emergency, it is long past time for the governor to follow the Constitution and convene the Legislature rather than contravene lawful statutes through executive fiat.”

Ducey is doing nothing wrong, said Patrick Ptak, the gubernatorial press aide.

“Throughout the response to COVID-19, the governor has had to make tough decisions to protect public health,” Ptak said.

Ducey is acting both consistent with state law and in consultation with the White House Coronavirus Task Force, he said.

“These executive authorities exist to protect public health,” Ptak said. And the actions the governor has taken so far using that power “have clearly made a positive impact in combating COVID-19,” he said.

Brnovich, in his filings, does not address the health issues. Instead, he said, it’s a simple legal question of whether the governor can simply ignore state laws.

The new filing puts the attorney general on the side of more than 100 bars who have been forced to close by the governor’s orders. They are asking Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Pamela Gates to allow them to reopen. A hearing on the matter was held Friday afternoon, but no ruling had been made as of the Arizona Daily Star’s deadline.

Ilan Wurman, the attorney for the bars, contends that Ducey does not have the constitutional authority to shut down bars — or any other businesses for that matter. And Wurman raises many of the same arguments about discrimination.

Arizona has multiple license categories for the sale of alcoholic beverages.

One of the big categories is bars, consisting of Series 6 licenses to sell all alcoholic beverages and Series 7, which is for bars that serve only wine and beer. The other big category is Series 12, which is for restaurants.

The big difference is that bars do not need to meet the requirement that at least 40% of their gross proceeds come from the sale of food. And they also have the right to sell beverages out the door, something Ducey gave restaurants the right to do even though they are not entitled to that under Arizona law.

All that makes bar licenses more valuable, especially as there are only a limited number in each county. Other types of licenses are available for microbreweries, hotel bars, wineries, private clubs and tasting rooms.

But Ducey’s order shut only bars.

In responding to the lawsuit, the governor said the discrimination is justified.

“Patrons of bars are more likely to become impaired, which can cause patrons to be less cautious of COVID-19 mitigation strategies like physical distancing and mask wearing, not to mention that patrons who are drinking are unable to wear a mask,” Ducey’s lawyers said.

Brnovich, for his part, said that argument is unconvincing.

“Both bars and restaurants are already prohibited from serving a patron to the point of intoxication,” he said.

Anyway, Brnovich said, if the issue is food — the sole distinction in bar and restaurant liquor licenses — the legal solution would be to require bars to meet the same 40% food-sales requirement, a move that would treat all establishments equally.

And what makes matters worse, he said, is that bar owners who violate the governor’s orders are subject to criminal penalties, including fines and jail time.

In filing the brief, Brnovich told Gates this is about more than just how Ducey is, in his opinion, violating state law by shutting down bars. For example, he said, the governor, without seeking legislative approval, has effectively repealed a state law regarding the training required to be certified as an assisted-living-facility caregiver.

Concerned about COVID-19?

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News