Escorted by a security detail, former special counsel Robert Mueller arrives to testify to the House Judiciary Committee about his investigation into President Donald Trump and Russian interference in the 2016 election, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 24, 2019. Mueller told lawmakers he could not exonerate President Donald Trump of obstruction of justice and that the president’s claims that he had done so in his report are not correct. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

The following column is the opinion and analysis of the writer.

Well, the three-ring partisan circus also known as the Mueller hearings is over. The hours of testimony, and the hundreds of hours of media and political commentary leading up to the highly anticipated grilling, are in the history books. The days of analysis, most based on little but educated guesses, are thankfully in the rearview mirror.

A week later, the dust has settled and the political class has rendered their verdicts. Democrats declared victory. Many in the media, surprisingly, called it a disaster, while Republicans said it was time to move on. What we haven’t heard much about is what the American people thought of Jerry Nadler and Adam Schiff’s latest attempt to back up their claims of collusion and obstruction by the Trump campaign.

In a Winning the Issues survey done July 27-28, after the hearings, we tested voter interest and assessment of the Mueller appearance before Congress. Voters’ partisan affiliation played a role in both their interest and how they assessed the testimony. Almost half of all voters (49% ) said they saw some of the congressional hearings and the testimony of the former special counsel; 55% of Republicans and 53% of Democrats said they watched.

Those may seem like high numbers, and they are. But in all likelihood, this high degree of interest reflects the widespread post-hearing media coverage, which focused on clips showing Mueller’s interaction with committee members from both sides. While most people didn’t sit down and watch more than six hours of testimony, it would have been nearly impossible for anyone tuning into a cable channel or getting a social media fix to avoid seeing the partisan back-and-forth .

The partisan nature of the hearings may also explain why a smaller number of independents (37%) and moderate independents (25%) said they saw the hearing.

Despite the Democrats’ best effort to bolster the credibility of their key witness, Mueller and his shockingly weak performance didn’t fare well with voters in their post-hearing assessment — 38% viewed him favorably, while 40% viewed him unfavorably. Digging a little deeper into the numbers with voters who will play key roles in the 2020 election, the survey found independents weren’t impressed (34% favorable, 42% unfavorable). Neither were suburban women (37% favorable, 41% unfavorable).

What people told us they heard from Democrats last week may explain their lack of enthusiasm. A combination of “allegations of Donald Trump’s ties to Russia,” “Mueller report and congressional hearings” and “discussions about impeachment of the president” accounted for 43% of what voters said they took away from the Democrats. And did it work for them?

Overall, voters reacted more negatively than favorably, at 37% more favorable and 45% less favorable to Democrats in Congress based on what they heard.

But what should worry Democrats is the reaction from independents (22% favorable, 48% unfavorable), moderate independents (19% favorable, 43% unfavorable) and suburban women (33% favorable, 41% unfavorable).

Both the political and ideological centers responded negatively to what they heard from the hearings. The data clearly shows it wasn’t just Republicans or center-right independents who took a dim view of the Democrats’ strategic messaging. Moderate independents told us they weren’t thrilled either.

The survey data also raises the question of whether the Democrats’ decision to put all their eggs in the Mueller basket came at the expense of kitchen table issues. When we asked voters to rank 22 news stories on their importance in terms of their congressional vote, the Mueller report and congressional hearing came in 19th, with the economy and jobs at the top of the list.

Nor does it seem the hearings helped the Democrats’ satisfaction rankings with voters overall. Only 36% of voters said they were satisfied with the Democratic majority in the House, while 52% said they were not satisfied. As you would expect, Republicans were at one end of the spectrum (20% satisfied, 73% dissatisfied), and Democrats were at the other (60% satisfied, 25% dissatisfied).

But the concerning news for Democrats is the fact that independents (22% satisfied, 63% dissatisfied) were at almost the same level as Republicans, with moderate independents slightly worse (21% satisfied, 63% dissatisfied).

With the Mueller hearings a dud, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who understands the risks for her party in a divisive and likely unsuccessful impeachment, has clearly decided to slow-walk the drive for impeachment. But as the number of Democratic House members favoring impeachment continues to climb, with some Democratic senators hopping on board the impeachment train this week, whether she can keep her caucus from what is likely to be another disaster remains to be seen.

Before any more Democrats join their colleagues to embrace impeachment, they might ask themselves a question. Did the Mueller hearings change the political calculus at all? A Quinnipiac poll (July 25-28) released this week found that voters, when asked whether Congress should begin the process to impeach Trump, opposed impeachment, 60% to 32% . A month earlier, their June 12 survey found opposition to impeachment at 61% to 33% .

If there’s anything to be learned from the Mueller hearings (and there isn’t much), it is this: If you’re going to put on a circus, you better have a net.

David Winston is the president of the Winston Group and a longtime adviser to congressional Republicans.