Skip to main contentSkip to main content
Register for more free articles.
Log in Sign up
Back to homepage
Subscriber Login
Keep reading with a digital access subscription.
Subscribe now
You have permission to edit this collection.
Edit
Arizona Daily Star
72°
  • Sign in
  • Subscribe Now
  • Manage account
  • Logout
    • Manage account
    • e-Newspaper
    • Logout
  • News
    • Sign up for newsletters
    • Local
    • Arizona
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Nation & World
    • Markets & Stocks
    • SaddleBrooke
    • Politics
    • Archives
    • News Tip
  • Arizona Daily Star
    • E-edition
    • E-edition-Tutorial
    • Archives
    • Special Sections
    • Merchandise
    • Circulars
    • Readers' Choice Awards
    • Buyer's Edge
  • Obituaries
    • Share Your Story
    • Recent Obituaries
    • Find an Obituary
  • Opinion
    • Submit a Letter
    • Submit guest opinion
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Opinion & Editorials
    • National Columnists
  • Sports
    • Arizona Wildcats
    • Greg Hansen
    • High Schools
    • Roadrunners
  • Lifestyles
    • Events Calendar
    • Arts & Theatre
    • Food & Cooking
    • Movies & TV
    • Movie Listings
    • Music
    • Comics
    • Games
    • Columns
    • Play
    • Home & Gardening
    • Health
    • Get Healthy
    • Parenting
    • Fashion
    • People
    • Pets
    • Travel
    • Faith
    • Retro Tucson
    • History
    • Travel
    • Outdoors & Rec
    • Community Pages
  • Brand Ave. Studios
  • Join the community
    • News tip
    • Share video
  • Buy & Sell
    • Place an Ad
    • Shop Local
    • Jobs
    • Homes
    • Marketplace
    • I Love A Deal
  • Shopping
  • Customer Service
    • Manage My Account
    • Newsletter Sign-Up
    • Subscribe
    • Contact us
  • Mobile Apps
  • Weather: Live Radar
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • YouTube
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
© 2026 Lee Enterprises
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Arizona Daily Star
News+
Read Today's E-edition
Arizona Daily Star
News+
  • Log In
  • $1 for 3 months
    Subscribe Now
    • Manage account
    • e-Newspaper
    • Logout
  • E-edition
  • News
  • Obituaries
  • Opinion
  • Wildcats
  • Lifestyles
  • Newsletters
  • Comics & Puzzles
  • Buyer's Edge
  • Jobs
  • 72° Showers in the Vicinity
Share This
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • WhatsApp
  • SMS
  • Email

Get ready to vote for Pima County Attorney

  • Jul 9, 2016
  • Jul 9, 2016 Updated Oct 7, 2016

After defeating a challenger in the Democratic primary election, longtime Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall is facing Green Party candidate and environmental lawyer Cyndi Tuell.

Green Party candidate challenges longtime Pima County attorney

After defeating a challenger in the Democratic primary election, longtime Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall is facing a Green Party candidate in the Nov. 8 general election.

Environmental lawyer Cyndi Tuell said she’s been working hard over the past several months to get to know people in the community and make sure the public is aware there’s a civil side to the County Attorney’s Office.

LaWall, who was elected Pima County attorney in 1996, is seeking her sixth term.

Tuell decided to pursue the position in May, after recently becoming more active in Tucson’s Green Party community.

“The group initially suggested I run because I’m an attorney,” she said. “After I thought about it for a moment, I realized how important this position is for the environment.”

Within the County Attorney’s Office civil division is a land-use and environmental unit, which allows the office to bring legal action for violations, such as those involving water or air quality, Tuell said.

“The Pima County attorney could have engaged more fully in the whole Rosemont (copper mine) process and could have done more,” she said.

A large portion of the county attorney’s budget is dedicated to the environment, and there are enough financial resources to make some improvements, Tuell said, such as making sure everyone is well-versed in the National Environmental Policy Act.

The candidates differed in their stance on Proposition 205, which would regulate marijuana like alcohol.

LaWall is opposed to the law, saying that she believes the societal costs will be significant.

“Legalizing the pot market (in Colorado) has not caused illegal drug dealing to disappear,” she said, also mentioning the increase in marijuana-related hospitalizations and traffic fatalities since the legalization.

To the contrary, Tuell believes that Proposition 205 is a good start, but doesn’t go far enough.

“I support the legalization of marijuana and an end to the war on drugs because of the catastrophic impacts the militarization of our police and the militarization of our borders has had on our communities on both sides of the U.S./Mexican border,” she said.

During her campaign, LaWall has touted her success in creating unique and innovative public safety and justice-related programs, and says she still has several ideas she’d like to implement.

“My highest priority is to develop a crimes strategies unit,” she said. “This approach will help use our limited prosecutorial resources more efficiently by using technology to gather and deploy intelligence on (county-wide) crime patterns and our most serious priority offenders.”

Tuell, an avid bicyclist who doesn’t own a car, listed bike and pedestrian safety as a priority she’d like to address if she takes over the office.

“The current county attorney isn’t adequately prosecuting people who hit bicyclists and pedestrians,” she said. “I want those people to have equal protection of the County Attorney’s Office when it comes to injury or death.”

With the County Attorney’s Office currently understaffed, LaWall said she is committed to increasing those numbers and creating a “true community prosecution approach,” which she lacks the resources to do.

“I believe that prosecutors have a responsibility not only to prosecute offenders, but also to work with the community to solve public safety problems, prevent crime and improve confidence in the justice system,” she said.

Tuell said that one of the first things she’d like to do is look at the data and statistics regarding who the County Attorney’s Office is prosecuting and convicting, to see if there are any racial, socioeconomic or gender discrepancies.

“Barbara LaWall said all the right people are in jail, but I absolutely disagree,”she said. “Every day in this country, people are wrongfully charged, arrested and convicted. The data will show if there’s a bias.”

Steller: Candidates increasingly view debates as optional

It used to be that if the League of Women Voters or the local TV station called up to schedule a debate, candidates found a way to put it on their calendars.

They could quibble about details of date, time and location, but in general, they debated.

That was part of being a candidate — opening oneself up to personal public scrutiny and even questions directly from the public or an opponent. Not always comfortable, but it usually was informative for the voters whom the candidates are, after all, asking for their votes.

No longer. Now candidates are treating debates as optional.

Perhaps the most prominent example this fall: The race for Pima County sheriff.

Republican challenger Mark Napier has said he’s willing to debate wherever, whenever. The Democratic incumbent sheriff, Chris Nanos? Not so much.

Nanos went back and forth in deciding whether to attend a candidate forum scheduled for this Saturday and sponsored by the Green Valley News, editor Dan Shearer reported.

“Nanos’ campaign seemed a bit surprised at the request but said yes over the phone. Then they said no.”

“Then yes. Then no again.”

After another yes, the final answer was no, he reported.

There are explanations, of course. Nanos and Napier had an ugly discussion at the Star’s editorial board meeting, one Nanos told me he doesn’t want to repeat.

And Nanos disliked that Napier criticized him publicly for not debating, labeling him an “appointed” sheriff in a disparaging way (though of course that’s what Nanos is, having been appointed by the Pima County supervisors in 2014).

But this isn’t just about Nanos and Napier. Increasingly, it seems, candidates are opting out of debates.

“When I came here in 1988, it was just assumed that everybody would do debates,” radio host and longtime public-television anchor Bill Buckmaster told me Tuesday. “On Arizona Illustrated, we invited all the major candidates. It was highly unusual for anybody to skip it. If anybody did skip, it became a big story.”

These days, incumbents, especially, tend to see more risk than reward in exposing themselves to the uncertainty and onstage equality of a person-to-person debate. It lowers the incumbent’s profile to the level of the challenger.

Incumbent Pima County Supervisor Ally Miller, a Republican, is refusing to acknowledge Democratic challenger Brian Bickel or any of the usual local interviews — Star editorial board, Arizona Public Media’s Metro Week, etc.

But then there are challengers who also, somewhat inexplicably, take this tack. Ana Henderson, the Republican challenging for a state House seat in Legislative District 9, declined to show up for the Star’s editorial board or for a candidate forum on Sunday, sponsored by the Pima County Interfaith Council.

Henderson, and her Democratic opponents, Pamela Powers Hannley and Rep. Randy Friese, are scheduled to appear at the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission debate at 6 p.m. Oct. 14 at Pima Community College’s northwest campus, 7600 N. Shannon Road. Henderson and Powers Hannley have to, because they are taking public money for their campaigns through the clean-elections system.

Publicly funded candidates face a $500 fine if they don’t show up for their clean elections debate. It’s not a huge deterrent, but the vast majority do show up.

In fact, the clean elections debates have become a sort of backstop event, even though only 37 of 144 legislative and Arizona Corporation Commission candidates are taking part in the system and obligated to appear. If no other debate gets put together in those races, at least the clean-elections one does.

That doesn’t help for the higher- or lower-level offices, though.

So far, no local debate is scheduled between the candidates for U.S. House in Congressional District 2, which covers the eastern Tucson area and much of the rest of southeastern Arizona. Republican incumbent Rep. Martha McSally will face Democratic challenger Matt Heinz Oct. 12 at Buena High School in Sierra Vista.

But a debate scheduled for Vail Wednesday has been postponed and not rescheduled because Heinz said he could not attend. Organizers are looking for a new time. Heinz, on the other hand, did attend Sunday’s candidate forum, but was not permitted to speak because McSally had said she would not attend.

The timing issue reveals another pressure causing debates to diminish: early ballots. The fact that voters get their ballots by mid-October means organizers have about three weeks less time to put on their event. The longer you wait after voters get their ballots, the fewer people who will be paying attention.

I don’t expect the trend to reverse, though. Pima County Attorney Barbara LaWall, a Democrat, avoided debates with challenger Joel Feinman in the primary season, although they did appear at a couple of candidate forums. She won the primary handily.

In 2014, Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Diane Douglas, a Republican, avoided all but one of a half-dozen possible debates with Democrat David Garcia. She won anyway.

The only encouraging counterpoint to the trend is the race for Tucson Unified School District board. There had already been three debates before Tuesday night, when a fourth occurred.

To encourage that trend, the best thing we can do is to vote for the people who show up, make themselves available and, yes, vulnerable to the risk of a debate. The exchange that happens there keeps our system vital.

Barbara LaWall defeats Democratic challenger in county attorney race

Barbara LaWall has defeated her Democratic challenger in the heated primary race for Pima County attorney.

Joel Feinman conceded to LaWall in a news release early Wednesday, thanking his supporters and reiterating his dedication to reforming the justice system.

“After a long hard fight, it is evident the election did not go the way we had hoped,” said Feinman. “This doesn’t mean we will lose heart. Mass incarceration is still a problem in our community, and the Pima County justice system still needs reform to better serve us all.”

LaWall came out ahead as early election results began to roll in Tuesday night, and maintained a solid lead throughout.

“I am grateful beyond words to be able to continue my leadership in the office and to work on your behalf to protect the public safety of Pima County,” LaWall posted on her campaign’s Facebook page Wednesday afternoon. She could not be reached for comment.

LaWall declined to debate Feinman early into the campaign, saying that she didn’t believe her seat was open. In an aggressive campaign, Feinman implied that she was soft on crime, and chose to pursue nonviolent drug offenders over cases such as sexual assaults.

LaWall will face Green Party candidate Cyndi Tuell in the Nov. 8 general election. There is no Republican candidate.

Early voting begins in six weeks.

Sheriff’s race

Republican Mark Napier took an early lead in the primary race for sheriff on Tuesday night, with nearly twice the votes of his opponent, Terry Staten.

On Wednesday morning, Staten acknowledged his loss on Facebook and said that he planned to support Napier during the general election in any way possible.

“I entered this race because with all of my heart and soul I believe change is needed at the Pima County Sheriff’s Department. Not winning the Primary Election has not, in any way, changed that belief,” the post said. “Despite our differences in the campaign, I truly believe Mark Napier is a good, honest and just man.”

Napier faces Sheriff Chris Nanos, who ran unopposed in the Democratic Primary, in November.

Assessor’s race

Incumbent Bill Staples defeated challenger Brian Johnson in the Democratic primary. Staples faces independent candidate Suzanne Droubie in November.

Schools superintendent

Dustin Williams remained ahead of Michael Gordy in the Democratic Primary. The winner will face Republican Margaret Burkholder in November.

The county elections department was still processing about 18,000 votes Wednesday evening.

Related to this collection

Arizona Daily Star
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Arizona Daily Star Store
  • This is Tucson
  • Saddlebag Notes
  • Tucson Festival of Books

Sites & Partners

  • E-edition
  • Classifieds
  • Events calendar
  • Careers @ Lee Enterprises
  • Careers @ Gannett
  • Online Features
  • Sponsored Blogs
  • Get Healthy

Services

  • Advertise with us
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • RSS feeds
  • Newsletters
  • Photo reprints
  • Subscriber services
  • Subscription FAQ
  • Licensing
  • Shopping
© Copyright 2026 Arizona Daily Star, PO Box 26887 Tucson, AZ 85726-6887
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertising Terms of Use | Do Not Sell My Info | Cookie Preferences
Powered by BLOX Content Management System from bloxdigital.com.
  • Notifications
  • Settings
You don't have any notifications.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News