The newly-crunched numbers are in: Arizona is the only school in college basketball history to lose to NCAA Tournament seeds 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
Here’s the roll call:
(11) Xavier, 2017;
(12) Miami of Ohio, 1995;
(13) Buffalo, 2018;
(14) East Tenn. State, 1992;
(15) Santa Clara, 1993.
There’s more: Arizona is one of only three ever to lose five games to double-digit seeds when seeded in the top four itself.
The others: Kansas, which lost to a 10 (Stanford), two 11 seeds (VCU and Auburn), a 13 (Bradley) and a 14 (Bucknell).
And Syracuse, which lost to three 11 seeds (Dayton, Marquette and Rhode Island); a 13 (Vermont) and a 15 (Richmond).
But spotlighting Arizona’s upset history is kicking a team when it is down.
Any school that has been seeded in the top four so often — 20 times for UA since the NCAA expanded the field to 64 teams in 1985 — is going to get shocked periodically. As we see every March, that’s the wonderful nature of the Madness.
Arizona has some impressive company in this business of Shocking.
As a top 4 seed, Duke has lost four times to double-digit seeds: 10, Providence; 11, Boston College; 14, Mercer; and 15, Lehigh.
Since the bracket expansion in ’85, no team has lost to more double-digit seeds than UCLA — eight. But the Bruins were a top-4 seed in just three of those upsets, none more shocking than losses to No. 13 seeds Princeton and Penn State.
And there’s another variable that goes unmentioned when a frequent upset victim such as Arizona absorbs another round of ridicule: Most teams would trade places with the Wildcats for the opportunity to take a chance at getting beat in the NCAA Tournament.
Since these upsets began in 1992, Arizona has played in 69 NCAA Tournament games. Arizona State has played in nine. Colorado? Eight. Cal? Just 21. Even mighty UCLA, which has gone to four Final Fours in that period, has played fewer NCAA games (59).
The issue now isn’t losing to obscure opponents, it’s how long will it take Arizona to get back to the NCAA Tournament.
Sean Miller must first hire two assistant coaches and acquire six or eight more players, depending on possible exits by six roster holdovers.
Pay particular attention to those Miller hires. Are they retreads and yes-men, just looking to get a paycheck? Or are they coaches commensurate to a program of Arizona’s accomplishments?
Is Miller willing to pursue someone like UCLA’s David Grace, who, in my opinion, is the league’s most feared recruiter and top assistant coach? Grace is an Arizona native and, I believe, would listen to any offer by Arizona, even given the ongoing FBI investigation.
Would Miller try to get Adam Cohen off the Stanford staff? Cohen, who has worked at Harvard, Vanderbilt, USC and Rice, was hired by Lute Olson a decade ago, a student manager who has worked his way up and is, in my opinion, a Josh Pastner-type worker.
If men like Grace and Cohen are willing to work for you, the healing process can begin.
Given its silence, Arizona appears to be taking the path of least resistance. Sort of a “let’s see if Miller can dig out of this mess while the FBI completes its investigation.”
If the 2018-19 season is a fiasco, Arizona can then consider another option.

