Trump's Reflecting Pool Dispute Deepens as Preservation Group Says DOJ Filing Weakens Vandalism Claims
Plaintiffs in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool case asked a federal judge for limited expedited discovery to preserve evidence before additional repairs. They pointed to a Department of Justice reversal in the David Hearn case, where prosecutors moved to dismiss charges after new evidence suggested damage stemmed from a rushed installation rather than vandalism. The filing from The Cultural Landscape Foundation argues the government’s revised explanation contradicts earlier statements by Interior Department officials and notes acknowledgments of "less than fulsome information." Government attorneys opposed discovery, saying the suit falls under the Administrative Procedure Act, which generally bars such requests. Plaintiffs said the DOJ findings significantly changed the case and support preserving the Reflecting Pool’s condition as the dispute continues.
As featured on
The number of new investigations has declined to a 20-year low even as misconduct complaints soar, a review found.
