Skip to main contentSkip to main content
Register for more free articles.
Log in Sign up
Back to homepage
Subscriber Login
Keep reading with a digital access subscription.
Subscribe now
You have permission to edit this collection.
Edit
Arizona Daily Star
87°
  • Sign in
  • Subscribe Now
  • Manage account
  • Logout
    • Manage account
    • e-Newspaper
    • Logout
  • News
    • Sign up for newsletters
    • Local
    • Arizona
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Nation & World
    • Markets & Stocks
    • SaddleBrooke
    • Politics
    • Archives
    • News Tip
  • Arizona Daily Star
    • E-edition
    • E-edition-Tutorial
    • Archives
    • Special Sections
    • Merchandise
    • Circulars
    • Readers' Choice Awards
    • Buyer's Edge
  • Obituaries
    • Share Your Story
    • Recent Obituaries
    • Find an Obituary
  • Opinion
    • Submit a Letter
    • Submit guest opinion
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Opinion & Editorials
    • National Columnists
  • Sports
    • Arizona Wildcats
    • Greg Hansen
    • High Schools
    • Roadrunners
  • Lifestyles
    • Events Calendar
    • Arts & Theatre
    • Food & Cooking
    • Movies & TV
    • Movie Listings
    • Music
    • Comics
    • Games
    • Columns
    • Play
    • Home & Gardening
    • Health
    • Get Healthy
    • Parenting
    • Fashion
    • People
    • Pets
    • Travel
    • Faith
    • Retro Tucson
    • History
    • Travel
    • Outdoors & Rec
    • Community Pages
  • Brand Ave. Studios
  • Join the community
    • News tip
    • Share video
  • Buy & Sell
    • Place an Ad
    • Shop Local
    • Jobs
    • Homes
    • Marketplace
    • I Love A Deal
  • Shopping
  • Customer Service
    • Manage My Account
    • Newsletter Sign-Up
    • Subscribe
    • Contact us
  • Mobile Apps
  • Weather: Live Radar
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • YouTube
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
© 2026 Lee Enterprises
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy
Arizona Daily Star
News+
Read Today's E-edition
Arizona Daily Star
News+
  • Log In
  • $1 for 3 months
    Subscribe Now
    • Manage account
    • e-Newspaper
    • Logout
  • E-edition
  • News
  • Obituaries
  • Opinion
  • Wildcats
  • Lifestyles
  • Newsletters
  • Comics & Puzzles
  • Readers' Choice Awards
  • Jobs
  • 87° Fair
Share This
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • WhatsApp
  • SMS
  • Email

Candidates for Congressional seats

  • Oct 10, 2010
  • Oct 10, 2010 Updated Nov 2, 2010
Prefer us on Google

Youthful challenger for US Senate asks Ariz. voters to pass the torch

We've seen this imagery somewhere before.

The elder, occasionally cantankerous, statesman pitted against a young, charismatic candidate.

That dynamic is front and center in the bid by former Tucson City Councilman Rodney Glassman to unseat incumbent U.S. Sen. John McCain.

Glassman reminds voters at every turn he's the "next generation," noting he and his wife are having a baby daughter who will be in Arizona schools over the course of the six-year term.

"It's time to turn the page from the fellow who's been there for nearly three decades and who hasn't been bringing new ideas to our state," the 32-year-old is fond of saying, in his efforts to make the 74-year-old McCain look downright geriatric.

Not to mention stingy.

Glassman cites project after project languishing in towns, from road to water programs, that McCain hasn't fought for, given his famous aversion to pork.

And obstructionist. "It's time to have someone who's willing to work with everyone," Glassman said.

Although he didn't finish his first council term - he said the dire straits of the economy forced his hand - he points to his efforts there as proof of his consensus-building. He was successful in efforts to require new homes to be plumbed for solar water heaters and gray water, and was able to open schoolyards to double as neighborhood parks after school.

Glassman tends to talk in sweeping generalities on big issues - a trait that infuriated his primary challengers who wanted him to answer questions with specificity. And it's why McCain says he won't debate Glassman again. "We had a debate, and his comments were nothing but clichés," the incumbent said.

Glassman, for example, in a recent editorial-board meeting agreed the national debt is a significant issue.

Asked how he would address it, he said the country has to prioritize - just like families. Then he said the country needs to invest locally. "It's not about not spending; it's about spending strategically," he said, although he ended his comments with acknowledging a need to reduce spending.

But when pressed on what he'd cut, he responded: "It's a matter of reconnoitering … and reducing spending, meaning we need to be spending locally in a way that's going to stimulate the economy and generate revenue. We need to be strategic."

He said the Government Accountability Office would be a great resource to help eliminate redundancies in departments but didn't have any specifics on where those service duplications exist.

McCain, meanwhile, has been touring the state, trying to patch up a tattered relationship with groups like tea parties, who looked with suspicion on his earlier bipartisan efforts on everything from immigration to campaign-finance reforms.

He's not sounding bipartisan anymore, reviving a months-old line at a recent tea-party rally that he disagrees when the president calls Republicans the "party of no." "We're the party of hell, no," he said.

Ever since his primary win, he's been telling crowds this election will be "seismic." At a unity rally in Tucson after the August election, he pledged: "We will cut the spending. We will repeal and replace Obamacare, and we will bring our troops home from Afghanistan with honor."

Health-care reform didn't work, he said. The stimulus didn't either. "All we did was lay a trillion-dollar debt on future generations of Americans," he said. "That's gotta stop."

Asked about his legacy in a recent debate, McCain gave a rambling answer. He said he hopes he will be remembered as having a reputation for honesty, integrity, straight talk and making a significant contribution on national-security issues.

One could almost hear a guffaw from primary opponent J.D. Hayworth at the "straight talk" reference. The charge from the primary that McCain's a political shape shifter has continued with Glassman, who started his campaign with a daily example of McCain flip-flops.

McCain has tried to explain away the about-faces as natural evolution in a changing world. Once the leader in a push for a more humanitarian approach to immigration, he now talks exclusively of border security, pointing to high-profile violence driven by Mexican cartels. Once an opponent of the Bush tax cuts as a giveaway to the wealthy, he now supports them, saying the economy is too fragile to flirt with higher taxes. His support for the bank bailouts? A mistake, but mostly because of the way they were implemented, he now says.

The aggressive, daily campaign he mounted against Hayworth has largely scaled back to auto pilot in the general, with polls showing he continues to hold a strong lead. He has nevertheless characterized the election as a choice. He has tried to paint Glassman as a liberal, saying a vote for Glassman will be a vote for another stimulus package, to continue health-care reform and to encourage more earmarks. "He's clearly out of step with Arizona and the people of the state," McCain said recently.

Libertarian David Nolan agrees with Glassman on very little except that McCain has overstayed his welcome.

An advocate of far smaller government - he pledges to take a meat ax to spending - and abolishing the personal income tax, Nolan criticizes McCain for supporting troops overseas and the bank bailout. "Republicans talk about cutting spending, but they never actually do it," he said, adding he would raise the retirement age to help stabilize Social Security.

"Our federal government is putting the taxpayers of America on the hook for an unsustainable burden of debt," Nolan said.

Green Party candidate Jerry Joslyn - and, yes, the Green Party has given him the nod in a year in which many candidates with the party label had platforms that were decidedly not Green-leaning - said ending dependence on oil is important from the environmental and the national-security perspectives.

He is also pushing a flat tax. In exchange for eliminating the income, payroll, capital-gains and inheritance taxes, taxpayers would get a $20,000 standard deduction and pay a flat 28 percent on all income above that. That would eliminate deductions that allow the wealthy to skip out on their fair share of the tax burden, he said.

On StarNet: Join a Nov. 2 Election Night live chat on StarNet for discussion, updates, a scoreboard of major races and fun with our cartoonist, David Fitzsimmons. Sign up now for an e-mail reminder: azstarnet.com/electionchat

Rodney Glassman

Running for: U.S. Senate

Party: Democrat

Age: 32

Occupation: Former Tucson city councilman

Education: Juris doctorate and doctorate in arid land resource sciences, University of Arizona

Public offices held: Tucson City Council, Ward 2, 2008-2010

Civic involvement: Board member of the Catalina Council Boy Scouts of America, founder of the Glassman Foundation, sponsor of the University of Arizona Band Day.

Top endorsements: Arizona Education Association, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Arizona AFL-CIO

Top priority: Putting Arizona first by working for jobs, education and federal immigration reform.

Website: www.rodneyglassman.com

John McCain

Running for: U.S. Senate

Party: Republican

Age: 74

Occupation: U.S. senator

Education: United States Naval Academy, 1958; National War College, 1974

Public offices held: Elected to the U.S. House of Representatives from Arizona in 1982. After serving two terms, was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1986.

Civic involvement: None listed

Top endorsements: Arizona Chamber of Commerce, Arizona Fraternal Order of Police, Citizens Against Government Waste

Top priority: Get our economy moving again to create jobs and stabilize our housing market.

Website: www.johnmccain.com

David Nolan

Running for: U.S. Senate

Party: Libertarian

Age: 66

Occupation: Retired marketing and communication consultant

Education: Bachelor of science in political science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Public offices held: None

Civic involvement: Founding member of the national Libertarian Party in 1971; member at large of the Libertarian National Committee that sets policy and strategy for the party; member of MENSA

Top endorsements: Liberty Candidates; Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Barry Hess; and Thomas Woods, author of "Meltdown" and "Nullification"

Top priority: To reduce the size, cost, power and intrusiveness of the federal government.

Website: www.nolan2010.org

Jerry Joslyn

Running for: U.S. Senate

Party: Green

Age: 60

Occupation: Investor

Education: Some college courses at Arizona State University with a focus on business and economics

Public offices held: None

Civic involvement : None

Top endorsements: Green Party

Top priority: We need to make structural changes to the economy to get us growing again.

Website: www.joslynforsenate.com

Contact reporter Rhonda Bodfield at 573-4243 or rbodfield@azstarnet.com

Giffords battles to keep seat in key race

In a year when opponents are asking congressional Democrats to answer for government spending on stimulus plans and bailouts of banks and auto companies, U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords is calling her opponent "a risk we can't afford."

Giffords wasted no time telling voters that Republican Jesse Kelly wants to eventually phase out Social Security, that he has said Medicare beneficiaries were "on the public dole" and that he wants a double-digit national sales tax. Before the clock struck midnight on primary election day, she had already debuted an advertisement saying the tea party candidate wanted to risk Social Security. She's carried that message through the campaign.

On the trail, she's talked about her plan to protect Social Security payments, especially to crowds of constituents who already receive these federal benefits.

Kelly has spent his time telling voters about the economic danger in leaving the Democrat in office for another term, highlighting the national debt, unemployment figures and Giffords' votes for bank bailouts and the health-care law.

He held at least three campaign events at retirement communities to talk to people about his plans for Social Security.

He tells groups that unemployment has doubled since Giffords has been in office, and has hammered her votes for the health-care overhaul, stimulus and the bank bailout.

Social Security is but one example of how much the two political philosophies differ.

While Giffords wants to strengthen Social Security in the long term, she's waiting to hear recommendations on how to do so in a forthcoming report from a bipartisan commission on this and other federal financial reform questions.

The commission's report is due to Congress in December, and Giffords said she's focusing on border security, military issues and the technology industry, issues her constituents sent her to Washington to work on.

"This is not a crisis," she said in an interview. "Social Security needs to have adjustments, but like I said, it will be solvent through 2037." Until then, the system is taking in more than it's paying out, she said.

"Getting Americans back to work and shoring up the debt and deficit is my job, and that's one of the most important angles or aspects to making sure that Social Security continues to be there for future generations," she said.

What's clear is that she doesn't want to eliminate it, reduce benefits or raise the age at which retirees can receive benefits.

That's where the candidates divide.

Kelly's campaign has said its numbers show the system will need an infusion of cash from bonding starting in 2015, and uses that as its insolvent date.

Giffords has aired television ads quoting Kelly on Social Security, saying he wanted to "phase it out," and "eliminate it." Even though the ads use video of Kelly's own words, he says the clips are taken out of context and calls them lies.

"Literally, the clip that she plays, the next sentence during that interview I say you have to protect the benefits of people that are currently on it," Kelly said.

He wants to allow people the option of taking their money out of Social Security and investing it themselves. He says that will prove to be a better system, so eventually Social Security as we know it will no longer exist. As for those who choose to stay on the system while others withdraw their contributions: The country must attract businesses by reducing corporate taxes, he said. With more businesses paying taxes, even if those rates are lower, there will be more money for government necessities.

"Those tax revenues get used not only for Social Security, to fund all the obligations of our federal government," he said.

While Kelly's message is anti-Giffords, his feelings go beyond his own representative. When asked how he will work with Democrats in Washington, he frequently responds, "I hope there are no liberals left when I get there."

But back to the charges the two are throwing at each other.

In September, Giffords' campaign released its own list of facts the Kelly campaign was getting wrong, including that she voted for the auto-industry bailout and that she can invest her own Social Security earnings as she pleases. Neither is true.

"It is unclear whether Mr. Kelly knows the truth and chooses to ignore it, or is just misinformed," said Rodd McLeod, Giffords' campaign manager, in a news release.

Even in a year where Democrats are on the defensive in districts throughout the country, Giffords is defending a seat she's won by more than 10 percentage points in her previous two elections.

The district has been considered a swing district, where the Democrat has won handily though more voters are registered Republicans than Democrats.

There are 157,000 Republicans registered to vote in the district, compared with about 140,000 Democrats and 121,000 independent voters.

It's also a race being watched from afar, as pundits try to speculate how many House Democrats will lose their seats to Republicans. The Rothenberg Political Report, Cook Political Report and Real Clear Politics have rated the race as a toss-up.

Giffords, who has held the office since 2006 and was a state legislator and small-business owner before that, has held the financial advantage since before she knew who her opponent would be. She brought in $700,000 in the third quarter of the year to add to the $2.2 million she'd raised through the first half of the year.

Detailed federal campaign finance reports are due next week, but in the meantime the campaigns offered their latest fundraising numbers through the end of September.

Kelly reached the $1 million mark, adding $535,000 raised in the third quarter to the $488,000 he'd raised through the first half of the year. He's a Marine Corps Iraq war veteran who works as a project manager in his family's construction company.

The difference between the candidates is stark on many issues.

On health care: Kelly wants to repeal "Obamacare," while Giffords says the health-care overhaul improved coverage for many of her constituents.

On taxes: Giffords supports keeping the Bush-era tax cuts for "98 percent of working Americans," while allowing cuts for the top-earning 2 percent to expire at the end of the year. Kelly would like to see a 10 percent flat income tax for all taxpayers, or a 23 percent national sales tax with the elimination of all income taxes.

On party loyalty: Kelly says Giffords has voted with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi 90 percent of the time. While that may be the case, Giffords said, Pelosi has taken dozens of votes this year while the rest of the House members have taken thousands. She says she's split with her party on many of those decisions, including when she turned down some appropriations budgets, voted against pay raises for Congress and pressed her leadership for strong immigration enforcement.

"On issue after issue ... he is out of step with the majority of the people of the state of Arizona, and I believe out of step with mainstream Republicans as well," Giffords said.

Kelly has a similar line: "We are getting broad support from voters of all parties because they are very disappointed with Giffords' bailout for Wall Street, her $500 billion cuts to Medicare and her opposition to SB 1070."

Libertarian Steve Stoltz decided to enter the race when it was clear fellow Libertarian David Nolan, who sought the seat in 2006, wouldn't run again.

Stoltz is running because of the economy and what he calls Washington's overspending. He would push for a bill to require the budget to be balanced each year. Stoltz dislikes the federal health-care overhaul, and while he agrees the system needs to be fixed, the bill was too broad, he said.

"You don't throw the baby out with the bath water," he said of the bill.

He questions whether Kelly will really listen to voters if he's elected, and says Giffords will be a lame duck in what he predicts will be a Republican-led House if she's re-elected. His party's outsider status would be a benefit, he said.

"Libertarians have enough overlap with Republicans and Democrats that they can work with either party," Stoltz said.

The candidates face off in three debates the week of Oct. 17.

On StarNet: Find these profiles and others for candidates in other races at azstarnet.com/elections

Gabrielle Giffords

Running for: U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Party: Democrat

Age: 40

Occupation: U.S. representative, Arizona's 8th District

Education: Bachelor's in sociology and Latin American studies, Scripps College, 1993; master's in regional planning, Cornell University, 1996

Past elected public offices: Arizona state representative (2001-2003), Arizona state senator (2003-2005), U.S. representative, Arizona's 8th District (2007-present)

Civic activities (all former): 162nd Air National Guard Fighter Wing Support Committee; Anti-Defamation League of Arizona, board of directors; Tohono Chul Park, board of directors

Top endorsements: Veterans of Foreign Wars Political Action Committee; Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs; National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

Top priority: Serving Southern Arizona by securing the border and creating jobs.

Web address: giffordsforcongress.com

Jesse Kelly

Running for: U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Party: Republican

Age: 29

Occupation: Project manager for Don Kelly Construction

Education: High school diploma

Past elected public offices: None

Civic activities: None

Top endorsements: Gov. Jan Brewer because she stands up for Arizona; Club For Growth because they want to help create new jobs; and Pinal Sheriff Paul Babeu because he understands how to secure the border

Top priority: Repeal Obamacare, cut government spending, and jobs, jobs, jobs.

Web address: www.votejessekelly.com

Steven Stoltz

Running for: U.S. House of Representatives, District 8

Party: Libertarian

Age: 45

Occupation: Senior engineer

Education: Bachelor's in physics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1987; Ph.D. in physics, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1998

Past elected public offices: None

Civic activities: none at the moment

Top endorsements: Liberty Candidates.org, Boston Tea Party National Committee

Top priority: Banking reform, replacing unconstitutional laws (health care) with constitutional options.

Web address: www.stevestoltzforcongress.com

Contact reporter Andrea Kelly at akelly@azstarnet.com or 807-7790.

Campaign climate is toughest in years for Grijalva in CD7

The most popular word in Congressional District 7 this election cycle is "boycott."

With other congressional Democrats denouncing Rep. Raúl Grijalva's call for a boycott of the state last spring to oppose SB 1070, and an anti-incumbent national mood, it has set up a tougher political year than the four-term congressman has seen in a while.

When Republican Ruth McClung entered the race a new phrase was born: "Boycott Grijalva, not Arizona."

Grijalva has since backed away from his call, saying the boycott was intended to get policy makers to think about the consequences of the law, and that wasn't happening. He also backed off because the Justice Department "took the heart out of many of the points of contention," and the boycott was hurting people who lost their jobs as a result of it.

He won his past three elections with more than 60 percent of the votes each time, but he has admitted some things could have led to a different tone this election season.

He told supporters last month the party should have pushed harder for a public option in the federal health care overhaul, and worked for more job creation in the federal stimulus bill. Instead, it softened the bills in the name of compromise and to help Democrats facing tough elections.

"What did we gain? The opposition isn't any less intense than it would have been," he said at a campaign meeting.

The district includes western Pima County, Yuma County, and parts of Santa Cruz, Pinal, Maricopa and La Paz counties. More than 142,000 voters in the district are registered Democrats, with about 75,000 Republicans and nearly 104,000 independents.

That gives four-term incumbent Grijalva an advantage. But in a year of voter unrest, anger over federal spending and tea party momentum, McClung pulled out a five-way primary victory with 50.6 percent of the vote.

At the last campaign reporting deadline, Grijalva had raised $545,000 and had about $77,000 left. McClung raised $72,000 and had about $16,000 left.

She said she'd vote for an amendment to require the federal government to balance the budget each year. One way to do that is "zero-based budgeting" in which each department submits a list of things it wants to do, and funding is decided based on priorities.

"Certain things are good to spend money on, but not as good as something else," she said.

She also wants to move many spending decisions to local governments, which have a better idea what their communities need.

The physicist works on navigation for a Defense Department contractor, and has adopted the campaign slogan "Maybe it does take a rocket scientist."

She wants to move toward privatizing Social Security for younger generations, but first put a "lockbox" on the program to protect those receiving benefits now or in the next few years.

Grijalva has been spearheading a letter-writing effort to oppose cuts to Social Security benefits. The letter to President Obama says Social Security has not contributed to the national debt, and shouldn't be cut for budgetary reasons.

In his fifth term, Grijalva said he would like to repeal No Child Left Behind, create a public financing system for federal elections, and work on immigration reform and legislation on carbon emissions.

Though the national climate may not be the best year for Democrats, it doesn't necessarily indicate a landslide Republican shift, said Republican pollster Margaret Kenski.

"As I look at the data that you see from poll after poll after poll, it's not that they're so crazy about the Republicans, but they think the Obama agenda is not what they wanted when they thought they voted for change," Kenski said.

The fiscal issues of the day may defy party politics, she said.

"People are really not crazy about either (party) right now, but they do want smaller government and they don't like to see the debt piling up," Kenski said.

There are two options for those who feel neither major party has the answer this year: Libertarian George Keane and independent Harley Meyer.

Keane won his August primary and says his goal is "drastic cuts across the board on everything," based on constitutionally required federal spending. "You don't hear our congressman talking about it, but we have a debt of $1.4 trillion, and we need to get some of our spending levels in line," he said.

That includes cutting military spending by closing all overseas bases and funding to other countries. "We can't afford it," he said.

Meyer said the economy was the main reason he entered the race. "I know we have an economic crisis, and I know what we need to do to get out of it," he said. That plan includes increasing competition among companies here, and importing fewer goods.

"The business model that's causing the economic crisis is also causing illegal immigration, and not just on our border but around the world."

On StarNet: Find candidate profiles for local races at azstarnet.com/ elections

Raúl M. Grijalva

Party: Democrat

Age: 62

Occupation: Member of Congress, U.S. representative, AZ District 7

Education: Bachelor of arts in sociology, University of Arizona.

Past elected public offices: U.S. Congress, 2003-present. Pima County Board of Supervisors, 1989-2002. Tucson Unified School District Governing Board member, 1974-1986.

Civic activities: Reading is fundamental (pre-school reading programs), literacy causes and grandchildren.

Top endorsements: American Nurses Association, Arizona AFL-CIO, Sierra Club.

Top priority: Job creation, bring public and private sector action on creating jobs to turn economy around.

Web address: www.grijalvaforcongress.com

Ruth McClung

Party: Republican

Age: 28

Occupation: Guidance navigation and control engineer

Education: Bachelor of arts in physics, University of Arizona; some graduate level courses in optics from the University of Arizona.

Past elected public offices: None.

Civic activities: Tutored fellow students in physics; involved in church and political activities.

Top endorsements: Border Patrol Union 2544, National Right for Life, Central Arizona Block Co.

Top priority: Work to ensure jobs and prosperity for all Americans.

Web address or phone number: www.ruth4az.com 520-579-5734

Harley Meyer

Party: independent

Age: 50

Occupation: Math teacher at a private school teaching eighth and 11th graders.

Education: Teaching licensure, masters in math education, University of Minnesota 2001; B.S., economics with math emphasis, University of Minnesota 1995; B.S., mathematics, Institute of Technology, University of Minnesota.

Past elected public offices: None.

Civic activities: Running for Congress for the economy.

Top endorsements: None.

Top priority: Economy.

Web address: http://harleymeyer.com

George Keane

Party: Libertarian

Age: 32

Occupation: Loan servicer for mortgage company.

Education: BA interdisciplinary studies in anthropology and religious studies ASU, 2008.

Past elected public offices: none

Civic activities: Volunteer and contribute to tea party events; Habitat for Humanity twice.

Top endorsements: None.

Top priority: Drastically cut our current spending levels.

Web address or phone number: http://www.facebook.com/pages/George-Keane-For-Congress/110972178949460

Contact reporter Andrea Kelly at akelly@azstarnet.com or 807-7790.

Related to this collection

Giffords battles Kelly to keep seat in key race

Today's Election Day: Here is the info

Today is Election Day. Here's what you need to know.

Arizona Daily Star
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Bluesky
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Arizona Daily Star Store
  • This is Tucson
  • Saddlebag Notes
  • Tucson Festival of Books
Prefer us on Google

Sites & Partners

  • E-edition
  • Classifieds
  • Events calendar
  • Careers @ Lee Enterprises
  • Careers @ USA Today Co.
  • Online Features
  • Sponsored Blogs
  • Get Healthy

Services

  • Advertise with us
  • Register
  • Contact us
  • RSS feeds
  • Newsletters
  • Photo reprints
  • Subscriber services
  • Subscription FAQ
  • Licensing
  • Shopping
© Copyright 2026 Arizona Daily Star, PO Box 26887 Tucson, AZ 85726-6887
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertising Terms of Use | Do Not Sell My Info | Cookie Preferences
Powered by BLOX Content Management System from bloxdigital.com.
  • Notifications
  • Settings
You don't have any notifications.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News