The following is the opinion and analysis of the writer:
MJ Watz
Tucson is on the verge of deciding how tens of millions of dollars could shape its environmental and community future.
Through the proposed agreement between the City of Tucson and Tucson Electric Power, approximately $2 million per year, totaling around $56 million over the life of the agreement, would be directed toward climate, energy, and community initiatives.
This kind of funding does not come along often. But what matters most is not just the amount, it’s how those funds are prioritized.
One public meeting took place April 7. Another, on April 22, will give residents and organizations a chance to weigh in. These moments may seem procedural, but they are one of the clearest opportunities for the public to influence how community investment is defined in practice.
People are also reading…
Too often, funding conversations happen in fragmented ways, with different groups advocating for different priorities in isolation. But Tucson has something unique: a strong network of organizations and volunteers already doing the work of environmental education, conservation, and stewardship across the region.
The question is whether those voices will show up aligned.
A shared emphasis, even across short public comments, could help ensure that certain priorities are not overlooked. Among them:
— Community-based environmental education and outreach
— Stewardship and conservation efforts
— Equitable access to sustainability resources
— Long-term ecological resilience in Tucson
These are not abstract ideas. They are already visible in the work happening across Tucson’s parks, trails, classrooms, and neighborhoods. Volunteers and educators are helping residents understand desert ecosystems, conserve water, and build resilience in the face of extreme heat and climate change.
What expanded funding could do is scale that impact, making these resources more accessible, more consistent, and more embedded in the community.
Public comment may feel small in comparison to a $56 million figure. But in processes like this, patterns matter. When multiple voices reinforce the same themes, they create a signal that decision-makers can’t easily ignore.
This is not about competition between organizations. It’s about clarity.
If Tucson wants to invest in a future that is sustainable, resilient, and community-driven, then those values need to be clearly and consistently articulated while decisions are still being shaped.
These meetings are not just informational; they are formative.
And for those already doing the work on the ground, this is a moment to ensure that work is recognized, supported, and expanded.
Tucson doesn’t just have funding on the table.
It has a chance to decide what kind of city the funding builds.
Follow these steps to easily submit a letter to the editor or guest opinion to the Arizona Daily Star.
MJ Watz is a Tucson-based filmmaker, artist and community volunteer.

