ATLANTA - States that crack down on illegal immigrants should also help farmers who need seasonal labor, the nation's largest farm lobbying group said Tuesday.
If Congress doesn't overhaul immigration, farmers will assist the federal government in helping states create programs giving growers access to enough legal labor, under a policy approved at the American Farm Bureau Federation's annual convention.
The policy retains the Farm Bureau's long-held view that immigration policy should be set by the federal government.
"So far, all of these state programs have been on enforcement only," said David Winkles, president of the South Carolina Farm Bureau, whose members proposed the policy. "They don't address the fact that we don't have an adequate labor supply in agriculture."
In recent years, some state governments have passed laws attempting to crack down on illegal immigrants. A new wave of legislation is expected this year as politicians consider measures similar to a law passed in Arizona.
People are also reading…
Among other steps, the Arizona statute requires that police, during the enforcement of other laws, question the immigration status of people they have reason to suspect are in the country illegally.
President Obama's administration has challenged that law in court, and a judge temporarily blocked the enforcement of several of its provisions.
Farmers rely on seasonal laborers, including many illegal immigrants, to harvest labor-intensive crops such as strawberries, onions, peaches and tobacco. The agriculture lobbying group says Americans refuse to take the difficult, low-paying jobs.
The federal government has a guest-worker program for agriculture workers, but farmers say it's expensive to use and inflexible.
"If a state can venture into the arenas of enforcing immigration, then they can venture in the arena of granting temporary legal status," Winkles said.
The debate over immigration policy reflected the delegates' regional concerns. They also voiced support for a secure border.
Texas representatives favored modifying the proposal so it supported the right of state governments to help enforce immigration law and border security.
