Poker Hall of Famer Erik Seidel has won 10 World Series of Poker bracelets while earning tens of millions of dollars in tournaments. But like many less prominent players, he’s now rethinking his career thanks to a federal tax change that will soon make gambling less profitable.
President Donald Trump holds his signed signature bill of tax breaks and spending cuts surrounded by members of Congress on July 4 at the White House.
“Next year I am kind of forced into retirement,” the longtime Las Vegas resident told The Nevada Independent. “Everyone who I’ve spoken to plans on either cutting back or stopping.”
The reason Seidel might have to retire is a tax law change enacted through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed by President Donald Trump in July. Whereas players could previously deduct 100% of their gambling losses from their winnings for tax purposes, starting in 2026, they will only be able to deduct 90% of their losses.
That means a player who wins $100,000 and loses $100,000 will only be able to deduct $90,000 from their winnings, forcing them to pay taxes on $10,000 of essentially phantom income.
People are also reading…
Nevada lawmakers have been fighting to reverse the change since it was passed. Although they have not yet managed to do so, they believe they can achieve a fix early in the new year.
On the House side, Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nevada, has led the effort to restore the 100% loss deduction through her FAIR BET bill. She’s been struck by the response.
“Turns out, we got a million responses to our tweet when we put it out there, more than I’ve ever gotten for anything,” she told The Indy in a recent interview, adding that it isn’t just high-rolling poker pros who will be hurt by the tax change — it’s also regular guys who bet on weekend football.
In the upper chamber, Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nevada, and Jacky Rosen, D-Nevada, have introduced the bipartisan FULL HOUSE bill, which would accomplish the same thing as Titus’s bill.
“The Republicans’ tax on gamblers is ridiculous and will be bad for Nevada’s economy,” Cortez Masto spokesperson Lea Hohenlohe wrote in a statement to The Nevada Independent. She added that the senator is trying to get the FULL HOUSE bill included in the appropriations package Congress aims to pass in January.
Nevada’s sole Republican in Congress, U.S. Rep. Mark Amodei, has valuable influence in a GOP-controlled House and said he’d been working alongside Titus to restore the gambling loss deduction.
“We have been assured that when we wrap up this stuff in ’26 appropriations, that fix will be in there,” he told The Nevada Independent.
Amodei — who chairs an appropriations subcommittee — has talked to House Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith, R-Missouri. After meeting with gaming CEOs in Las Vegas this summer, Smith pledged to reverse the tax by the end of the year.
“Jason said that, and that’s great,” Amodei told The Indy this month. “I saw him in the gym today, and I said, ‘So, when?’ So I’m gonna follow up.”
Afterward, Smith provided an optimistic statement to The Indy (“I believe there is a bipartisan path forward to restoring full deductibility of gambling losses.”) though he did not share a specific timeline.
Asked what she’d heard about Amodei’s efforts and GOP assurances, Titus said, “We’re talking to all of them all the time, but you can’t trust those people. We’ll believe it when it’s signed. So, hopefully that’s true. And he’s on the committee, he ought to be helping us, helping Nevada, so let’s hope he’s got an inside with the chairman.”
American Gaming Association CEO Bill Miller said he believes the deduction will be restored to 100% sometime early in 2026. During a Dec. 12 appearance on the Business of Betting podcast, Miller said he hasn’t met a member of Congress who is opposed to reversing the change.
“The question is, ‘What are the vehicles to fix this?’” Miller said. “Trying to get this put back in and fixed is not the easiest trick. But I believe that we’re going to get it done.”
Miller was in Las Vegas in early December to meet with resort industry leaders about the ongoing efforts.
One gaming source with knowledge of the effort said the timing of the change is uncertain, but it needs to happen no later than April 2027 for tax purposes. The deduction change takes effect on Jan. 1 and covers a gambler’s 2026 wins and losses. But even if Congress manages to change the law, Nevada’s gambling ecosystem is likely to start feeling its effects as soon as the new year begins.
“In January, there’s some tournaments here in the U.S., and I think people are not going to be competing in them, so I think there will be dealers and more people that will lose jobs,” Seidel said.
Circa Casino Resorts CEO Derek Stevens, who operates three downtown Las Vegas properties and a sports betting business, said he and other gaming companies are already being hurt by the legislation. Gamblers, he said, plan their trips far in advance and are already cutting back on their 2026 budgets because of the potential tax implications.
Stevens — whom Titus called the effort’s “champion” — said there is a “sense of urgency” within the gaming industry.
“This could be fixed next year. The reality is that it needs to be done now,” Stevens said. “It’s already impacting wagering that goes into 2026.”
Stevens said the tax implications could slow Super Bowl betting and the March Madness NCAA Basketball Tournament, two of the most heavily wagered annual sports events.
It’s also impacting slot players.
Stevens explained that a Circa slot player might hold back on wagering because of the lower tax deduction rate. He also worried that U.S. casino customers in northern states such as New York, Michigan and Washington might travel to Canadian casinos or gamble with illegal offshore betting sites to avoid the tax hit.
Stevens explained the situation to Smith earlier this month in Las Vegas during a meeting arranged by MGM Resorts International CEO Bill Hornbuckle and attended by top executives at Caesars Entertainment and Wynn Resorts.
He hoped Smith got the message.
“This is not good for the country, and it’s not good for the industry,” Stevens said. “It’s not good for tourism, it’s not good for hospitality, it’s not good for jobs. We know this is an inadvertent issue that is simply going to hurt everyone in the United States. It needs to get fixed and corrected soon.”
What $100k is worth in the largest U.S. cities in 2025
What $100k is worth in the largest U.S. cities in 2025
A $100,000 salary may sound like a comfortable income but how far it goes varies largely depending on where you live. Earning $100,000 places an individual tax filer at the upper limit of the 22% federal tax bracket. On top of that, FICA taxes for Social Security and Medicare apply, and depending on where you live, state and local income taxes could take another bite. But taxes aren't the only factor. The cost of living varies widely across the country, affecting how much purchasing power remains after necessary expenses. Given these factors, understanding where $100,000 stretches the furthest—and where it may fall short—can be crucial for budgeting and long-term financial planning.
With this in mind, SmartAsset determined the value of $100,000 in 69 of the largest U.S. cities for 2025, after accounting for applicable taxes and local cost of living premiums.
Key Findings
- $100k goes least far in New York City's borough of Manhattan, with only $30,362 spending power. After accounting for federal taxes, particularly high local taxes, and a cost of living 130.6% higher than the national average, a $100k salary goes least far in The Big Apple. Even after accounting for inflation, the value of $100k in 2024 was higher at $30,914. This year's second- and third-place cities where $100k is worth the least are Honolulu ($38,609) and San Francisco ($42,128).
- $100k goes furthest in these Texas and Oklahoma cities. Oklahoma City ($89,989), El Paso ($89,114), Corpus Christi ($88,015); and Tulsa ($87,439) ranked at the top of places where $100k stretches furthest. Texas has the advantage of no state or local income taxes, while Oklahoma's particularly low cost of living is enough to offset the state-imposed income tax and then some.
- $100k is now going further in these cities. The value of $100k increased by 6.6% year over year in Charlotte, North Carolina, to $81,780. Plano, Texas, saw a 6.4% increase to $71,372. And the value increased 6.3% to $73,358 in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Spokane, Washington; Washington, D.C.; and Indianapolis also saw the value of $100k improve, among others.
- The value of $100k dropped most year over year in New York City's borough of Queens. The value of $100k dropped by 6.5% year over year, from $49,978 to $46,708. This can mostly be attributed to an increase in the relative cost of living in Queens. Other cities where the value of $100k dropped most include Durham, North Carolina ($71,371); Phoenix ($71,688); Columbus, Ohio ($77,647); and Miami ($64,991).

10 Cities Where $100k Is Worth the Least
Cities are ranked based on the value of $100,000 after accounting for taxes and local cost-of-living premiums.
- Manhattan, New York
- Value of $100k in 2025: $30,362
- Value of $100k in 2024: $30,914
- Year-over-year change: -1.8%
- Honolulu
- Value of $100k in 2025: $38,610
- Value of $100k in 2024: $39,148
- Year-over-year change: -1.4%
- San Francisco
- Value of $100k in 2025: $42,128
- Value of $100k in 2024: $40,997
- Year-over-year change: 2.8%
- Brooklyn, New York
- Value of $100k in 2025: $43,461
- Value of $100k in 2024: $43,376
- Year-over-year change: 0.2%
- Queens, New York
- Value of $100k in 2025: $46,708
- Value of $100k in 2024: $49,978
- Year-over-year change: -6.5%
- Los Angeles
- Value of $100k in 2025: $47,983
- Value of $100k in 2024: $47,762
- Year-over-year change: 0.5%
- San Diego
- Value of $100k in 2025: $49,337
- Value of $100k in 2024: $50,082
- Year-over-year change: -1.5%
- Boston
- Value of $100k in 2025: $50,602
- Value of $100k in 2024: $50,109
- Year-over-year change: 1%
- Washington, D.C.
- Value of $100k in 2025: $51,339
- Value of $100k in 2024: $48,734
- Year-over-year change: 5.3%
- Oakland, California
- Value of $100k in 2025: $52,060
- Value of $100k in 2024: $51,237
- Year-over-year change: 1.6%
10 Cities Where $100k Is Worth the Most
Cities are ranked based on the value of $100,000 after accounting for taxes and local cost-of-living premiums.
- Oklahoma City
- Value of $100k in 2025: $89,989
- Value of $100k in 2024: $87,585
- Year-over-year change: 2.7%
- El Paso, Texas
- Value of $100k in 2025: $89,114
- Value of $100k in 2024: $88,840
- Year-over-year change: 0.3%
- Corpus Christi, Texas
- Value of $100k in 2025: $88,015
- Value of $100k in 2024: $86,383
- Year-over-year change: 1.9%
- Tulsa, Oklahoma
- Value of $100k in 2025: $87,439
- Value of $100k in 2024: $84,507
- Year-over-year change: 3.5%
- Memphis, Tennessee
- Value of $100k in 2025: $87,427
- Value of $100k in 2024: $86,960
- Year-over-year change: 0.5%
- Lubbock, Texas
- Value of $100k in 2025: $86,846
- Value of $100k in 2024: $85,065
- Year-over-year change: 2.1%
- San Antonio
- Value of $100k in 2025: $86,084
- Value of $100k in 2024: $85,625
- Year-over-year change: 0.5%
- Jacksonville, Florida
- Value of $100k in 2025: $84,509
- Value of $100k in 2024: $83,878
- Year-over-year change: 0.8%
- Houston
- Value of $100k in 2025: $83,343
- Value of $100k in 2024: $82,986
- Year-over-year change: 0.4%
- St. Louis
- Value of $100k in 2025: $83,082
- Value of $100k in 2024: $82,614
- Year-over-year change: 0.6%
10 Cities Where the Value of $100k Increased the Most
Cities are ranked based on the percentage increase in value of $100,000 after accounting for taxes and local cost-of-living changes year over year.
- Charlotte, North Carolina
- Year-over-year change: 6.6%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $81,780
- Value of $100k in 2024: $76,750
- Plano, Texas
- Year-over-year change: 6.4%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $71,372
- Value of $100k in 2024: $67,088
- Colorado Springs, Colorado
- Year-over-year change: 6.3%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $73,358
- Value of $100k in 2024: $68,987
- Spokane, Washington
- Year-over-year change: 5.4%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $81,441
- Value of $100k in 2024: $77,240
- Washington, D.C.
- Year-over-year change: 5.3%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $51,339
- Value of $100k in 2024: $48,734
- Indianapolis
- Year-over-year change: 4.5%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $82,759
- Value of $100k in 2024: $79,230
- Orlando, Florida
- Year-over-year change: 4.2%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $81,441
- Value of $100k in 2024: $78,168
- Portland, Oregon
- Year-over-year change: 3.8%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $60,427
- Value of $100k in 2024: $58,205
- Kansas City, Missouri
- Year-over-year change: 3.7%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $81,258
- Value of $100k in 2024: $78,382
- Atlanta
- Year-over-year change: 3.5%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $76,840
- Value of $100k in 2024: $74,240
10 Cities Where the Value of $100k Decreased the Most
Cities are ranked based on the percentage increase in value of $100,000 after accounting for taxes and local cost-of-living changes year over year.
- Queens, New York
- Year-over-year change: -6.5%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $46,708
- Value of $100k in 2024: $49,978
- Durham, North Carolina
- Year-over-year change: -4.1%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $71,371
- Value of $100k in 2024: $74,436
- Phoenix
- Year-over-year change: -3.1%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $71,688
- Value of $100k in 2024: $73,984
- Columbus, Ohio
- Year-over-year change: -3.0%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $77,647
- Value of $100k in 2024: $80,089
- Miami
- Year-over-year change: -2.7%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $64,991
- Value of $100k in 2024: $66,801
- Nashville, Tennessee
- Year-over-year change: -2.3%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $79,543
- Value of $100k in 2024: $81,429
- New Orleans
- Year-over-year change: -1.9%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $66,668
- Value of $100k in 2024: $67,926
- Manhattan, New York
- Year-over-year change: -1.8%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $30,362
- Value of $100k in 2024: $30,914
- Mesa, Arizona
- Year-over-year change: -1.6%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $74,056
- Value of $100k in 2024: $75,240
- San Diego
- Year-over-year change: -1.5%
- Value of $100k in 2025: $49,337
- Value of $100k in 2024: $50,082
Data and Methodology
This study used SmartAsset's paycheck calculator to apply federal, state and local taxes to an annual salary of $100,000 for an individual. This online tool calculates your take-home pay per paycheck for both salary and hourly jobs after taking into account federal, FICA, state and local taxes. This take-home income was then adjusted for the local cost of living in 69 of the largest cities in the U.S. using data from the Council for Community and Economic Research. The cost of living takes into account the price of housing, groceries, utilities, transportation, and miscellaneous goods and services. Cost-of-living index data is averaged across 2024.
This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

