A border agent said a rancher told him there were people shooting at him and he was shooting back and that he āpossibly struck something,ā during emergency calls on Jan. 30, which directly disputes subsequent claims made in court by the rancherās defense attorney.
The agent from the Nogales Border Patrol station was speaking on a call to the Santa Cruz County Sheriffās Office at about 2:40 p.m. that day.
āDisregard,ā the Border Patrol agent, who identified himself as a supervisor, said about a minute later on the call. āNow the personās not sure if heās being shot at. I donāt know if this guyās crazy or whatās going on.ā
The Nogales-area rancher, George Alan Kelly, later told a sheriffās dispatcher the same day that he found the body of āan animal ā itās not a vegetable or a mineralā on his property.
People are also reading…
When deputies arrived, Kelly took them to the body, which was of 48-year-old Gabriel Cuen Buitimea, of Nogales, Sonora, who had been shot to death, according to court records.
Kelly, 74, has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder in Cuenās death. His defense attorney, Brenna Larkin, told a judge Kelly only fired a warning shot over the heads of a group of armed, possible drug runners who approached him on his property.
Larkin did not respond Thursday to the Starās requests for comment.
Prosecutors say Cuen, an undocumented migrant, was unarmed and that Kelly shot him in an unprovoked attack as he tried to run away.
The two phone calls are among numerous Jan. 30 recordings between border agents, the sheriffās office and Kelly, public records obtained late afternoon Wednesday by the Arizona Daily Star and first reported on by the Nogales International.
The prosecutor, Chief Deputy County Attorney Kim Hunley of Santa Cruz County, said Thursday that ethical rules prohibit her from commenting on a case currently proceeding.
Conflicting statements
There are conflicting statements on whether Kelly said he was shooting or being shot at during another recording between the Border Patrol in Nogales and the sheriffās office, a few minutes after the first call.
āHe called a couple of minutes ago to our ranch liaison, not into here directly, and said that he was shooting at five who are shooting back at him,ā the agent told the sheriffās office.
Later in the call an agent said Kellyās last statement, eight minutes prior, was that āhe thinks they were shooting at him, and he thought he heard gunshots and then he saw people running, but he didnāt see any firearms, but heās checking his ranch with his weapons to check his livestock.ā
The sheriffās office asked if Kelly shot back, and the agent said, āNo. At least heās not saying he did.ā
The agent also said Kelly had made similar calls previously and they ended up being about undocumented migrants on his property.
In another follow-up call, at 5:52 p.m., from the supervisor at the Ajo Border Patrol station, the agent told the sheriffās office dispatcher that Kelly called the Border Patrol ranch liaison again, and this time āheās being intentionally vague.ā
āWhat he said was, in checking his property, he believes that he possibly struck something. He said those words, āpossibly struck something,ā ā the agent said. āAnd then my ranch liaison says, āHey, is somebody shot on your property? Can you call 911?ā And he says, āNo, I call you guys because you guys are usually the fastest ones to come.ā ā
āIām not admitting to anything Iāve doneā
At 5:58 p.m., a sheriffās dispatcher called Kelly to get more information. Kelly first told the dispatcher she should send a deputy to his ranch immediately but was hesitant to say why. He responded to many of the dispatcherās questions with long pauses and answers he acknowledged were vague.
āItās very serious, maāam, and I canāt ā Iām not going to talk over the telephone,ā he said.
When the dispatcher, based on the information she had from the Border Patrol, asked what he shot at, he responded, āI didnāt shoot at any ā I havenāt said I shot at anything.ā
āI donāt want to get you in trouble, and I donāt want to get me in trouble,ā Kelly told the dispatcher. āBut I donāt want to break the law or anything like that. So, what Iām telling you is that we need a sheriff deputy out here ⦠immediately and thatās all I can say maāam.ā
When she asked if anyone was hurt and whether to also send an ambulance, he said, āYou know the thing āyou have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be held against you.ā Well, Iām not admitting to anything Iāve done, but all those things tend to add up, and I donāt know what happened. I just know what I just saw about 15 minutes ago, and itās something that an ambulance cannot help; EMTs cannot help. Thereās nothing out here that can be aided by EMT or emergency services.ā
At one point Kelly said he was referring to āthe body.ā The dispatcher asked Kelly to take the deputy to what he found when the deputy arrives, and Kelly said he āhas a flashlight on over it.ā
āI only approached the body to make sure that the animal ā itās not a vegetable or a mineral ā the animal wasnāt alive, and it was not alive,ā Kelly told the dispatcher.
āThere was no sign of blood. There was just an animal laying face down,ā Kelly said.
When the dispatcher confirmed, āAn animal?ā Kelly repeated, āItās not a vegetable or a mineral.ā He said he would take a deputy to it.
When deputies arrived, he took them to Cuenās body, where he had set a lit flashlight on the ground, according to court records.
Prosecutors say no weapons or drugs were found on Cuenās body.
The defense says Cuen was likely shot by someone else, not Kelly.
Prosecutor: āExtreme indifferenceā to life
Kelly was originally charged with first-degree murder in the case, which he also pleaded not guilty to, before the state reduced the charge to second-degree.
Prosecutor Hunley explained the reduced charge by saying that even if Kelly shot Cuen by accident while intending to fire a warning shot, the state can establish he committed second-degree murder because of āextreme indifferenceā to human life in which āhe recklessly caused his death.ā
Larkin, Kellyās attorney, countered: āOur position is that that did not happen, that Mr. Kelly would not do such a thing, and that instead, what happened was that he was approached by armed men who were on his property.ā
The autopsy report found that the bullet entered Cuenās body from the back lower right portion of his rib cage and exited from his left upper chest area, The Arizona Republic reported, citing testimony from Jorge Ainza, the Santa Cruz County sheriffās detective who arrested Kelly.
A judge set a September trial date for Kelly, who was released on a $1 million cash bond on Feb. 22.
There is a self-published book on Amazon likely authored by Kelly called āFar Beyond the Border Fence.ā The book summary says itās āa contemporary novel which brings the Mexican Border/Drug conflict into the 21st century.ā
Authored by a man with the same name as Kelly, the novel focuses on a man named George and his wife, Wanda, which is the name of Kellyās real-life wife.
āSeveral times each week illegal immigrants would cross the VMR ranch,ā says a section in the book. āThey were led by armed human smugglers called Coyotes. George and his foreman had to patrol the ranch daily, armed with AK-47ā²s.ā
George Alan Kellyās defense lawyer Brenna Larkin lays out what she sees as issues with the prosecutorās case against Kelly during a hearing in Justice Court in Nogales on Feb. 22.
Ā
The prosecutor for the state outlines their position, during a hearing in Justice Court in Nogales on Feb. 22, in the case against George Alan Kelly, whom Santa Cruz County Sheriffās deputies arrested after finding the body of a Mexican national on Jan. 30 on Kellyās property near Nogales.

