The outcome of the military action between the United States and Iran is clear when measured by military capability, economic leverage, strategic position and long-term deterrence: America dramatically weakened one of the world’s most dangerous and unpredictable regimes and secured a decisive victory.
Shaun McCutcheon
Iran is diminished, exposed and with fewer options.
For decades, the Iranian people have lived under a government that fears freedom above all else. It fears free speech, dissent and the powerful human desire to assemble publicly and demand dignity, truth and self-government.
Brave Iranian citizens took to the streets calling for liberty, only to be met with bullets, prison cells, torture and death. Thousands of protesters have been beaten, arrested and killed for exercising rights Americans consider foundational. When a government fears the voices of its own people, it reveals its weakness. A government that murders its citizens for speaking the truth is not a government acting from confidence. It is a regime fighting for survival.
People are also reading…
America's previous nuclear deal with Iran was hardly a deal at all. Iran received cash, relief from sanctions and economic breathing room. In return, the world got delays, loopholes and false promises. Centrifuges were spinning while the ink on the deal was drying. Missile and drone stockpiles grew as money flowed to terrorist proxies across the Middle East. As violations occurred, the strongest response the United States and its allies often could muster was unenforced sanctions that amounted to little more than a strongly worded letter.
The situation is different today because American leadership is different.
Iran is not negotiating from strength. Its naval capabilities are devastated. Its conventional military power is severely degraded. Its ability to build or launch missiles is sharply constrained. Its regional deterrence is exposed as weaker than advertised. Most important, Iran cannot sell one drop of oil to the global market without the United States allowing it, directly or indirectly, through enforcement decisions.
Iran’s old playbook depended on leverage, time and American leadership unwilling to impose meaningful consequences. The regime’s ability to manipulate negotiations is dramatically reduced because the leverage it once relied on is largely gone.
That is why claims that Iran somehow “won” are detached from reality. Iran lost military capacity, strategic leverage, economic flexibility and the illusion of invulnerability.
Many of Iran’s senior leaders and military planners are gone. What remains is hardly a confident regional power. It is a junior varsity team suddenly forced onto the field after the starters were taken out. Many of those still in power are effectively operating in survival mode and hiding.
Meanwhile, the U.S. proved that American power still matters when used decisively. Deterrence is built when adversaries believe the U.S. is willing to act and capable of imposing real consequences, and that message was clearly delivered.
Iran will not become a nuclear power. The only question is how the regime chooses to arrive at that outcome. Whether through negotiation, sustained economic strangulation or military action, if necessary, the objective remains non-negotiable that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable.
Critics will point to higher gas prices or market volatility. They will argue this was a conflict nobody wanted or a war of choice. No rational person wants war. But something is far more dangerous than higher gas prices. A nuclear Iran would destabilize the global order, embolden terrorist networks, trigger a regional arms race and threaten international shipping lanes.
The Iranian people deserve freedom. The world needs security. And the regime in Tehran now faces the reality of enforced accountability. As the fighting slows and diplomacy continues, victory is shared by America, the region, the world and the Iranian people. The Iranian regime must comply or accept severe consequences.
