I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but it's almost like the GOP is secretly promoting the Democratic Socialists of America, which is producing a lot of the energy and excitement in the Democratic and Republican parties.
Jonah Goldberg
The DSA has many views wildly outside the mainstream of American politics, including the abolition of the police, prisons, the Pentagon and the U.S. Senate.
This is all, to borrow a term from social science, bat guano insane. Even if you think such proposals make sense on the merits -- I don't! -- politically, this stuff is nuttier than a pool party at Mr. Peanut's pad. For one, the Constitution effectively bans abolishing the Senate, even via amendment. So expending any political energy on eliminating it is like demanding 2+2 equal 5.
Democratic socialism has been winning in Democratic primaries lately, but it will ultimately lose — because it fails politically and economically.
But, man, do some people eat this stuff up. Specifically, fringe left-wing political activists, young and mostly white progressives with useless college and graduate degrees, and the Republican Party. The first two groups eat it up because they love it. The Republicans eat it up because they're eager to run against it.
People are also reading…
Republicans are increasingly insisting that the only way to stop a takeover by "godless communists" is to vote Republican.
"Communism is a mortal threat to American liberty," President Donald Trump said during a July 3 speech at Mount Rushmore. "It is the greatest threat to our country, including World War I, World War II, Pearl Harbor or even 9/11." (I agree! Barring some time machine shenanigans, communism is a bigger threat than Pearl Harbor and many other past events.)
"We're fighting right now in Congress over whether we're going to maintain our status as a constitutional republic," House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted. "Or we're going to trade that in, dismantle the foundations and go down this dark road of death to communism. That is the question on the ballot this fall."
There's a "bootleggers and Baptists" dynamic here. The DSA benefits from the attention, and the GOP benefits from the perception that Democrats are either too radical or too cowardly to confront the radicals in their ranks.
But I'm not too worried, even if the GOP fails to weaponize the Red Menace. If you look at the more mainstream question of socialism's alleged rise in popularity, fears of a socialist takeover of America are absurdly overblown.
Polls do show, particularly among young Democrats, increased support for socialism and a rising distaste for capitalism. But this isn't a new story. For the last couple of decades, dissatisfaction with the economic status quo has increased support for socialism. That's because people equate the status quo with "capitalism." As slaves to binary thinking, poll respondents think, "What's the opposite of capitalism?" Answer: socialism.
A 2014 survey by the Reason Foundation found that millennials favored capitalism to socialism by a meager 10 points (52%-42%). But when asked if they favored a "free-market economy" to a "government managed economy," the free market won 2-1 (64%-32%).
Fast forward to 2026. A recent Echelon Insights survey found that among Democrats under 50, the favorability of "capitalism" is minus 31 percentage points (it's popular with every other group). When asked their view of a "free market economy," support jumps 41 points to a positive view (it jumps with every other cohort as well).
In other words, "capitalism" means something very different than "free markets," even to many socialists. And that's fair enough. I wish our economy was more free market than it is. But a ton of people think "capitalism" is an adjective describing things they don't like about the economy, not a synonym for "free markets" or "free enterprise."
Oh, yeah: Net favorability for communism is -40.
The same applies for socialism, which means many different things to different people.
Once you get beyond the labels and the quirks of polling, reality suggests socialism is a much heavier lift. For example, according to Echelon, 74% of Medicare for All fans think it can be paid for solely by raising taxes on billionaires. This is a lie. Medicare for All would cost an estimated $32 trillion over 10 years. The total combined net worth of America's billionaires is around $9 trillion.
Forget taxes. You could confiscate everything the "billionaire class" owns and it wouldn't cover a third of the cost.
In other words, even if the "socialists" win, they'll lose at governing. And so will the popularity of socialism.
